Lack of decisions puts funding in Jeopardy |
Media Town Talk reported this week that PENNDOT is urging council to move this project along or risk losing its place for the funding in the state's 2013 Transportation Improvement Program. This funding in question is to cover the majority of the replacement cost. A separate grant from State Senator Pileggi is covering the rest.
After 16 years, a citizens advisory council (CAC), surveys, petitions and town hall discussions; the Media Democrats and Mayor Bob McMahon still can’t lead the project to completion even while their party holds every voting seat on borough council! Even a resident at last night's council meeting questioned how this matter was being handled. Shockingly, this late in the project, they are still fighting, even amongst themselves and those whose petitions they signed; over a one lane roadway across the bridge that they were recently told stipulates a road of two lanes. What’s more concerning is that Council President, Brian Hall stated in the article that this project was going backwards and not forwards. He went on to say that this effort wasn’t going anywhere until decisions were made. If they haven’t and/or can’t make decisions by now, then we've wasted an unprecedented amount of people's time and money for a project that was funded and ready to go.
Third Street bridge is regressing back to the same political games by the same
political party that have stifled Media borough of the progress it
rightfully deserves. 16 years and counting to fix a bridge that has
increased in costs by $2 million is
unacceptable. Brian Hall, Monica Simpson, Paul Robinson and Bob McMahon
have all served multiple terms with a council majority. They've
allowed the same exact thing to happen to the $1.9 million Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) program that after 15 years still isn't
finished.
It's interesting that the former borough engineer who received this
no-bid project and wasn't even qualified for doing the work, also was found to be contributing thousands of dollars
to the campaigns of the Media Democrats.
As the Media Democrats fight among themselves to protect their special interests(signed their petitions), allegiances and agendas; the town of Media, surrounding communities and RTM school district are left wondering if this bridge or any other projects will ever get finished.
As the Media Democrats fight among themselves to protect their special interests(signed their petitions), allegiances and agendas; the town of Media, surrounding communities and RTM school district are left wondering if this bridge or any other projects will ever get finished.
Have we had enough?
Tedman
Why even bother...."gold" stores....dollar stores....a government that hasn't done shit in years....Media is going to the birds....
ReplyDeleteI'm new to Media, what has been the specific issue(s) blocking the progress? (Not looking for a generic answer "it's because of the Democrats")
ReplyDeleteThe settlement agreement gives as good an explanation as anything else:
Deletehttp://mediapanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Media-Borough-3rd-St-Dam-Executed-Stipulation-Agreement-2011.pdf
From the propaganda blog?
DeleteThe document in the link is the actual settlement agreement posted by the "propaganda blog."
DeletePropaganda blog? Seriously?
DeletePot. Kettle. Black.
Go read that arrogant Lib's pre-election posts full of bias in every council summary. Note the subliminal use of boldface and italics, he's keeping the spirit of the people's republic alive.
DeleteAnonymous 8:37am, here's a link to a (Democratic) council member's blog with his view on things as of late May. I don't know what the current situation is, but this provides some details that the ATM blog usually doesn't get into:
ReplyDeletehttp://mediapanews.com/2012/05/17/borough-council-votes-5-2-to-move-forward-with-dam-replacement/
Just look what they did to the FROGs! Media democrats don't even like Media democrats.
ReplyDeleteMore cheese with that whine?
ReplyDeleteAt what point can we consider the FROGs a terrorist organization?
ReplyDeleteI thought this bridge was a danger in the current state
ReplyDeleteNice to see the disinformation mill is still grinding it out.
ReplyDelete