Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Should the proposed road across Third St. Bridge be ONE lane or TWO?

Should the proposed road across Third Street Bridge be ONE lane or TWO?  

 Media Borough Council is proposing a ONE lane only coming in to Media.  Please attend this Thursday's Borough Council Meeting at 8pm 9/20 at Borough Hall

 Take our Poll
Posted by at

17 comments:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM

    It was TWO - 2 - before WHY would it be any (LESS)different now and with each day that passes the cost is going UP. Get it operational NOW!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM

    Two way!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 9:31 AM

    Why would it be anything but a two lane bridge? Dumb Poll.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 11:13 AM

    Two lane....with all the bells and whitsles sought by frogs...bike peds etc

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM

    Two lanes with a covered bridge! Make that happen Tedman.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 11:59 AM

    If its one-way, that will be a shame as I will drive over it wrong- way on a daily basis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 4:21 PM

      No you won't. Not when Media Borough installs that electric gate with 3D cameras.

      Delete
  7. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM

    If it was not for the Third Street Bridge debate this blog would have very little traffic. Tedman is playing it for all it's worth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM

      Anon. 1:53 PM you've got to be kidding. Tedman's blog is most informative in the blogisphere, at least in our area. There is nothing on that other blog. It should be taken down it is so inactive. Tedman hits all the subjects and let's everyone have their say. Even you. First in the morning, I read the DT, them Tedman, then my bank balance, then the NYTimes. Boy, am I smart!

      Delete
    2. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 7:53 AM

      At least we can have confidence that Tedman wouldn't consider pushing a bond on this town unlike another fool.

      Delete
  8. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2012 at 2:57 PM

    Cvered Bridge good idea would deter large trucks..could be a tourist draw.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 7:49 AM

    It's just too bad that the court order didn;t specify a time frame to start or completion of this project. If I dont bring in a project on time and on budget there are financial ramifications - I wish DelCO and BLCC had the foresight to inflict penalties for every delay this borough council considers. They are PURPOSELY moving like snails!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 8:42 AM

    I hear there is now a movement building to petition boro council on having two-lane access, along with yard signs supporting their cause. What a mess Media boro has made of this bridge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 10:08 AM

      I'll sign that petition for 2-Way in a flash. So will my neighbors. Put the petition on the blog, Tedman.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 2:10 PM

      Where do I sign?!!!
      And where can I GET a sign.....i'm all over this.

      Delete
  11. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM

    I like the Boro council and think they do a good job and some criticisim of them on this blog is a little over the top.But regarding the Bridge they are making bad choices..one lane...are they that stupid to not see what is going on here.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousSeptember 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM

    2 way please - and stop the insanity

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)